This is part of my ongoing series on the Serpent Seed of Satan theory. In view is the supposed gotcha question posed by Serpent Seed of Satan theorists to the effect of that the story of Eve eating of the fruit of the forbidden tree really means that fruit means sex and tree means Satan. The question is just what realizing that they were naked have to do with literally eating a fruit from a literal tree. See, they would say, it is all symbolic.
Let us consider relevant portions of Genesis 2 and 3.
Adam and Eve “were both naked, the man and his wife, and were not ashamed” and so the first mention of nakedness is prefill and with reference to shame: as of yet, in this case lacking shame.
Eve “saw that the tree was…a tree to be desired to make one wise” keeping in mind that this was “the tree of knowledge of good and evil.”
Eve “took of the fruit thereof, and did eat, and gave also unto her husband with her; and he did eat.”
Reread as per the serpent seed of Satan theory, this reads that Eve had sex (took of the fruit thereof, and did eat) and gave (encouraged?) the very same thing to Adam so that he too had sex with Satan (gave also unto her husband with her; and he did eat).
Some serpent seed of Satan theorists who want to deny that Adam had sex with Satan especially so as to claim that Cain and Abel were superfecundationed twins (twins with two different dads, see Zen Garcia on Eve’s desire for the Angel of the LORD) claim that since fruit means sex then it just means that Eve gave of her fruit/sex to Adam so that he had sex with her.
Yet, sex with his wife Eve was not forbidden to Adam, was not a sin, would not have brought about a curse on him, would not make him responsible for the fall, etc. Also, the text is clear that she took from the tree (which serpent seed of Satan theory claims was Satan) ate fruit (sex) and took from the very same tree (Satan) and gave fruit (sex) to Adam. Thus, this is not only ungrammatical but illogical and il-theo-logical.
As a side note, if the tree of the knowledge of good and evil is really Satan then what is the tree of life? One could just invent the idea that it is symbolic of God but now you realize how this stuff is just being made up on the spot, as we go along, based on nothing but seeking to puff up and protect a preferred theory.
Thereafter, “the eyes of them both were opened, and they knew that they were naked.” This is when serpent seed of Satan theorists claim that the eating of fruit of the tree was a sexual event since we are directly thereafter told that they were naked. Well, they were naked all along however, it is when “the eyes of them both were opened” that “they knew that they were naked; and they sewed fig leaves together, and made themselves aprons.”
The opening of the eyes does not seem to imply that since their creation their literal eyes had been literally closed. Rather, it was specifically the eating of “the tree of knowledge of good and evil” which was “desired to make one wise” that they seem to have gained the knowledge of good and evil and so now they seem to have recognized that being naked had not only good connotations but also evil ones.
Well, in order to literally attempt to cover up that which they had done they take it upon themselves to sew “fig leaves together, and made themselves aprons.”
Next they “heard the voice of the Lord God, hid themselves and Adam states, “I was afraid, because I was naked; and I hid myself.” Recall that the first instance of referencing nakedness was in relation to shame which they did not feel but apparently, now they do which is why they cover themselves and hide.
God asks them “Who told thee that thou wast naked?” and “Hast thou eaten of the tree, whereof I commanded thee that thou shouldest not eat?” so that the specifically the knowledge of being naked is that which is directly correlated with having eated form “the tree of knowledge of good and evil” which was “desired to make one wise.”
Well, the blame game ensues with Adam stating “The woman whom thou gavest to be with me, she gave me of the tree, and I did eat.” This further strengthens the point about Adam having had sex with Satan if serpent seed of Satan theorist were consistent as Adam specifies that “The woman whom thou gavest to be with me, she gave me of the tree, and I did eat” which would mean: Eve gave me of Satan, and I did have sex with him.
Then we see that God rejects their works based atonement, as it were, in that rather than being covered by their fig leaf aprons, “the Lord God make coats of skins, and clothed them.”
Thus, there is no great mystery here and certainly not one only resolvable by the serpent seed of Satan theory.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
A plea: I have to pay for server usage and have made all content on this website free and always will. I support my family on one income and do research, writing, videos, etc. as a hobby. If you can even spare $1.00 as a donation, please do so: it may not seem like much but if each person reading this would do so, even every now and then, it would add up and really, really help out. Here is my donate/paypal page.
Due to robo-spaming, I had to close the comment sections. However, you can comment on my Twitter page, on my Facebook page and/or on my Google+ page.
Twitter: #serpentseed, #cain, #seedofsatan
Facebook: #serpentseed, #cain, #seedofsatan
